{"id":6634,"date":"2012-07-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2012-07-09T22:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/idibell.cat\/en\/blog\/2020\/05\/01\/barbara-marte-nature-editor-now-we-are-publishing-more-documents-than-ever\/"},"modified":"2022-06-13T12:23:34","modified_gmt":"2022-06-13T10:23:34","slug":"barbara-marte-nature-editor-now-we-are-publishing-more-documents-than-ever","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/idibell.cat\/en\/2012\/07\/barbara-marte-nature-editor-now-we-are-publishing-more-documents-than-ever\/","title":{"rendered":"Barbara Marte, Nature editor: ”Now we are publishing more documents than ever”"},"content":{"rendered":"
Nature<\/a>, first published on 1869, is the leading weekly, international scientific journal. Most scientific journals are now highly specialized, and Nature is among the few journals that still publish original research articles across a wide range of scientific fields.<\/p>\n Nature is a private owned publication. The Nature Published Group<\/a> (NPG) includes Nature, Nature Research Journals, Nature Review journals and academic journals (e.g. Oncogene<\/a>, BJC<\/a>). The main office of the group is in King Cross (London).<\/p>\n The new generation of editors<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cThe background is very important: a PhD and a postdoc. In my case, I have a PhD in the Nancy Hynes Lab, FMI, and a postdoc in the Julian Downward lab, ICRF in London\u201d, said Barbara Marte, the Nature senior editor, in his conference last July 6th in IDIBELL.<\/p>\n The Biology editorial receives around 150 papers, among letters and articles, a week and the 75-80% of them is returned without review. The numbers of submissions have increase. In 2011, they were more than 10.000 submissions.<\/p>\n Online, nature.com provides over 6 million visitors per month with access to NPG publications and online databases and services.<\/p>\n What is Nature looking for?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cWe are looking for technically solid content, mostly assessed by peer review. Also for understanding contribution to the field, lasting impact, with important implications for further directions of research, including translational research and clinic. Among our considerations: conceptual vs. incremental advance, depth of findings, a definitive finding, community resources, and interest to a wide scientific audience\u201d, said Marte.<\/p>\n \u201cWe use between 2-4 reviewers per paper from a \u201cdatabase\u201d or reviewers, but we also use authors\u2019 suggestions, literature searchers, and constantly add new referees to this list, and the \u201cbad\u201d reviewers can be removed\u201d, continued the senior editor of Nature.<\/p>\n The technical expert must have a technical assessment and judge the general quality of data. Their decisions are rejections, suggesting publication elsewhere or invite a revision, addressing the referees\u2019 comments or be accepted in principle.<\/p>\n